Tag: 上海夜网UK

  • Rand releases midseason flu vaccination status report

    first_imgDec 10, 2008 (CIDRAP News) – The Rand Corp. today released its first-ever midseason survey on the uptake of the current influenza vaccine, which found that public officials still have a tall task in front of them to administer this year’s record vaccine supply.The survey indicated that about 30% of US adults had received a flu shot by mid November, but more than half of those surveyed said they didn’t plan to get the immunization.In a teleconference with journalists today, representatives from public health groups including the National Vaccine Summit were on hand to comment on the report’s findings. William Schaffner, MD, president-elect of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, said, “This is a first-time opportunity to give ourselves a report card in the middle of the season, and we’ll do what we have to do to improve uptake.” He also chairs the Department of Preventive Medicine at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine.The release of the study is among several nationwide initiatives this week to support National Influenza Vaccination Week, designated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to raise public awareness of the importance of flu vaccination and to urge providers to extend their vaccination efforts into December and through the rest of the flu season.A timely status reportKatherine Harris, a Rand economist and coauthor of the survey report, said the goal of the report wasn’t just to gauge uptake; investigators also wanted to know if people were intending to get the flu shot this season, and if not, why not. A link to the 6-page report, along with supporting documents on the survey and its methodology, is available on Rand’s Web site.”This report provides the public health community with a midseason snapshot while there’s still time to act,” she said. The survey was conducted with funding from GlaxoSmithKline, maker of Fluarix and FluLaval influenza vaccines.The nationally representative survey included 3,969 adults (age 18 and older). Rand worked with Knowledge Networks, Inc., which conducts online studies with subjects recruited using random-digit dialing. Harris said the survey was administered to 6,056 online panelists between Nov 7 and Nov 19. Sixty-six percent of the group completed the survey.She said the Rand investigators pushed the limits of timely data gathering and were able to wrap up the details, including internal peer review, only 2 weeks after the survey’s Nov 19 conclusion date.Vaccination season takes shapeThe survey showed that 30% of the respondents had already been vaccinated, 17% said they planned to receive a flu shot, and 53% said they had no intention of doing so.Among respondents in groups recommended for vaccination, such as people older than 50 or with a high-risk condition, 37% said they had been vaccinated. But the percentage of those respondents who said they planned to be vaccinated was the same as in the overall group at 17%.”What we’re seeing here are huge opportunities for improvement,” Harris said. Schaffner added that he found the findings “sobering,” but he said a silver lining was the higher uptake among the higher-risk groups.About 30% of healthcare workers and caregivers reported receiving their flu vaccine, but 57% said they didn’t intend to get one. Schaffner said he hoped that low uptake and intent numbers in this group reflect the possibility that some healthcare institutions were still conducting their vaccination programs when the survey was taken.L.J. Tan, PhD, director of infectious diseases for the American Medical Association (AMA), said only 13% of the healthcare and caretaker group intended to be vaccinated. “We’ve got a lot of work to do here,” he said.Investigators explored vaccine uptake patterns so far among different chronic-disease groups. Those reporting receiving their vaccines ranged from 33% among asthma patients to 63% of respondents with chronic lung disease. Tan said that even those numbers show the need for more outreach to those with high-risk medical conditions.Vaccine uptake did not vary much across the country, according to the report. Schaffner called the numbers “wimpy across the board. We can’t celebrate or ding any part of the country.”Reasons for forgoing flu shotsThe research group also explored the reasons people haven’t yet gotten their flu shots. Forty-one percent said they didn’t have time, and 35% gave other reasons. Tan said he was concerned about the lack-of-time rationale. “It’s a cultural perception that this isn’t high on people’s priority list. If it was, they would find the time,” he said.Reasons for deciding not to get a flu shot included a perceived lack of need (25%), beliefs against flu shots (20%), fear of sickness or side effects (19%), and the belief that others need it more (8%). About 28% gave various other reasons, some of which included lack of physician recommendation and cost. Schaffner said the findings reveal that public health officials still have a lot of work to do to debunk popular myths about influenza vaccination.Claire Hannan, executive director of the Association of Immunization Managers, said the survey findings serve as a wake-up call and validate what public health officials are seeing in the field. She urged healthcare providers and the public health community to remind the public that plenty of vaccine is available, and to use the holiday season to persuade patients to give their families and loved ones the gift of prevention by getting vaccinated.MedImmune donates 1 million FluMist dosesIn other developments, the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) today announced that MedImmune, maker of the FluMist influenza vaccine, is donating up to 1 million doses of the inhaled vaccine in an effort to boost awareness about influenza and vaccination rates in underserved communities.NACCHO said it would funnel the donated vaccine to selected state and local health departments starting this month.Gary Cox, JD, president of NACCHO, said in a press release today, “These doses of vaccine will go a long way to support a national objective of immunizing all persons who should receive flu vaccine, especially those who are least able to afford it.”See also:Rand midseason influenza vaccination survey and supporting documentsDec 10 NACCHO press releaselast_img read more

  • Students Talk Back panelists take on ISIS

    first_imgThe Jesse M. Unruh Institute hosted its weekly Students Talk Back event yesterday afternoon in the Ronald Tutor Campus Center. The panel was titled, “A Global Threat: The Advancing Reach of ISIS and its Domestic Implications,” and discussed how the United States should respond to the terrorist organization both at home and overseas.Three experts on the topic were invited to USC to make up the forum’s panel: Terry McCarthy, current president and CEO of Los Angeles World Affairs Council; Seema Mehta, political reporter at the Los Angeles Times; and Shikhar Gupta, vice president of USC College Democrats.The event was co-moderated by Dan Schnur, executive director at the Unruh Institute and Emma Peplow, news editor at the Daily Trojan.McCarthy opened up the discussion by differentiating ISIS with other known terrorist groups. He explained how ISIS is completely unwavering in terms of negotiation.“Other groups use violence to achieve an endgame,” McCarthy said. “ISIS does not have that political ending in sight. Their tactic is to use violence to expand their territory. There is no negotiation with ISIS, you either get on their team or they will kill you,” he said.McCarthy explained that once individuals begin to perceive ISIS as susceptible to outside forces, they will be easier to defeat.“The way to counter that is to stop this expansion, and at the same time undermine their message because they need to keep recruiting people to help them,” he said. “Once ISIS is seen to be vulnerable and can no longer expand their caliphate, and once their acts are seen to be acts of criminals rather than of heroes, then I think they will be defeated fairly quickly.”McCarthy went into an in-depth discussion regarding the ISIS message and explained that in order to counteract ISIS in the Middle East, their ideology must be opposed.“ISIS is using quotes from the Quran to justify what they are doing,” McCarthy said. “The narrative has been using Islamic vocabulary to give hope to Muslims that feel as if they have nowhere else to go.”McCarthy continued to describe the circumstances that allowed for this narrative’s credibility.“The idea that young Muslims don’t have anywhere to go in the Middle East under their current parastructures is quite frankly quite valid,” McCarthy said. “There aren’t jobs, the education is not there, and if you’re a woman then God help you, because you won’t be allowed to go to college, let alone drive a car.”He said that the governmental structure in the Arab world has proven to be extremely unfair and exclusionary and how this narrative must be challenged by the Arab world.Mehta and Gupta emphasized the domestic implications of ISIS, switching the topic of conversation toward public opinion in the United States, the effects of social media and the language political figures use in addressing ISIS.Gupta explained that public opinion toward U.S. involvement in Iraq has drastically changed within the past four years.“Something interesting we see is that American support for airstrikes in Iraq has been very high over the past year of so,” Gupta said. “What we’ve seen recently is that American support for ground troops in Iraq is at 57 percent, which is interesting considering the past four years since we have withdrawn troops from Iraq. That is a very quick turnaround in public opinion.”A student in the audience then directed a question towards Gupta about the impact the media may have had on the dramatic turn in pubic opinion.“It may have to do with the novel nature of how ISIS operates in comparison to other conventional terrorist groups because they are making tremendous ground relatively fast,” Gupta said. “I think seeing the media cover this instills fear in the public, which in turn leads to more support for action.”The three panelists agreed that the media heavily impacts the public by showing some of the more brutal acts by ISIS. However, they recognized that the language used by political figures in the U.S. counteract the media in order to avoid discrimination domestically.By working as a journalist on multiple presidential campaigns, Mehta is is familiar with how politicians discussed ISIS, as well as other terrorist groups.“The president has been very careful with the language that he has used,” Mehta said. “It seems like the goal of the administrations for the past decade has been to avoid using words that make it seem like all Muslims are responsible for the terrorist acts that we have seen.”McCarthy responded to this with a warning about various forms of intolerant language.“In the U.S., we need to be forward-thinking, trying to create a society that can tolerate difference and even embrace it,” he said.He continued to address the language used in the political setting.“The words that you choose to use feed into the story that you are trying to tell,” McCarthy said. “If you’re trying to tell a story of exclusionism and superiority of one ethnic religious nationalist group over another that is a route towards violence and confrontation; if you’re trying to tell a story of inclusion and tolerance that is a completely different route. It speaks to the art of messaging.”last_img read more

Recent Comments