Tag: 上海夜网Stephen

  • Our rights were breached Heres how Apple will fight the EUs €13bn

    first_img 22 Comments Apple CEO Tim Cook Source: Niall CarsonEU decisionThis all obviously contrasts with the EU Commission’s original decision, which found that Apple’s Irish subsidiaries got special treatment that amounted to state aid.Fora has previously pulled out some of the key parts of the EU’s full 130-page ruling, and you can read some of the main points here.The legal battle will now go to the EU Court of Justice. The Irish government is also appealing the ruling, and has already spent €1.8 million fighting the EU’s decision.It is expected that the legal battle could take as long as six years before a final decision is made.Written by Paul O’Donoghue and posted on Fora.ie Image: Niall Carson Feb 22nd 2017, 6:30 AM Short URL APPLE SAYS THAT the EU failed on a number of fronts in its investigation into its tax affairs – and that it fundamentally breached the company’s rights.Last year the EU found that Ireland provided Apple with up to €13 billion in illegal state aid and ordered the government to recoup the money.Apple always said that it planned to fight the decision, and earlier this week its appeal against the ruling was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.The document lays out the 14 pleas Apple is planning to pursue as part of its legal case. You can read the full text here, but the key points are: ‘Our rights were breached’: Here’s how Apple will fight the EU’s €13bn Irish tax ruling The tech giant has been ordered to hand over the huge sum for illegal state aid. Get Fora’s NEW daily digest of the morning’s key business news: Wednesday 22 Feb 2017, 6:30 AM Image: Niall Carsoncenter_img Take me to Fora Apple says that the European Commission “failed to recognise that the applicant’s profit-driving activities were controlled and managed in the United States. The profits from those activities were attributable to the United States, not Ireland.”It said that the commission “made fundamental errors relating to the applicant’s activities in Ireland”. It said the Irish branches carried out “only routine functions and were not involved in the development and commercialisation of Apple IP which drove profits.”It claimed that the commission’s presumptions “are contrary to the burden of proof”. Basically, Apple is arguing the EU made up its mind about the company’s Irish tax affairs without properly assessing the evidence.Apple alleged that it did not receive “selective treatment”. This is a crucial point of appeal, as much of the EU’s case hinges on the argument that Apple got a deal not available to other Irish companies.It said that the commission “violated the principles of legal certainty and non-retroactivity by ordering recovery of the alleged aid”.It claimed that the commission failed to “conduct a diligent and impartial investigation”.Interestingly, it alleged that the commission breached the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights and infringed the company’s “right to good administration”. The charter guarantees ‘impartial, fair and timely treatment’.Finally, it claimed that the commission “exceeded its competence … by attempting to redesign Ireland’s corporate tax system”. By Fora Staff 11,769 Views Share39 Tweet Email1 Read: Michael O’Leary: The government should scrap one of Ireland’s ‘greatest policy catastrophes’Read: Irish users can now send money overseas using Facebook http://jrnl.ie/3250966 Tweet thisShare on FacebookEmail this articlelast_img read more

Recent Comments